Banished is a new 7-part series on CBC Television, premiering July 27, 2015 at 9pm.
In 1788, Britain banished its unwanted citizens & convicts to Australia. Last night's episode focused on two convict lovers who are forbidden to marry, and their best friend.
(Semi-spoiler alert ahead!)
I was looking forward to Part 1 but confess that it disappointed me. It had a very predictable storyline and characters. We had the obligatory evil convict, the hero convict who will suffer death rather than relinquish what he believes are his rights as a human being, the good-guy convict who puts on a good show of bravery but in reality is a coward.
Then you have the oh-so-horrid soldier, the overly practical officer who sees all problems in terms of what's best for the troops (with no humanity shown), the governor of the colony who is at heart a decent man constrained by rules and laws, the overly sympathetic and empathic minister's wife and on and on it goes!
Every major character was straight out of a beginner's handbook on writing romance novels.
Even the costumers and sets were too polished. The convicts' clothing was not dirty or torn enough. The soldiers in the field had immaculate uniforms. Everything looked like a stage set to me. Yes Elizabeth Quinn's hair was matted and rumpled, but it looked like the way we teased our hair with rat-tail combs back in the 60s. It just didn't have the ring of authenticity.
I was expecting more history, more of a documentary feel, and not quite so much fluff.
Yes I will watch the next episode (reluctantly) if only because I hope the writing and story line will improve.
I agree with everything you said. I wanted history. We Westerners know very little about Australia other than the main points and I was really looking forward to this. Maybe it will be better next week.
ReplyDelete